School shootings are a terrifying subject. It seems like it is a regular occurrence to hear about students – teens and children – injured or slaughtered by a school shooter. In 2021 it was reported that 187 school shootings killed or injured 152 people. That is 3 school shootings a week! It also is normal for cries for gun control laws immediately resound through the country as people demand the government do something to protect children. Ignoring the nonsensical element of this – the US government murders far more civilians a year than all criminals combined, meaning trusting them is a bit like handing a knife to a serial killer – the primal fear is understandable. Americans are more afraid than ever before for their children and only want them to be safe and the numbers tell us they’re in more danger not less! Right?

Well, what if I told you those numbers are completely unreliable?

What if I told you that school shooting reports are absolute nonsense?

What if I told you that school shooting reports mislead and deceive people more than they reveal?

What if I told you that you couldn’t trust the news when it talks about school shootings?

And what if I told you that this has been known for years and yet no changes have been made, the lies continue to mount, and media conglomerates continue to spread these lies to the public?

You would say that these are extraordinary claims which I need to prove. Well, here you go.

Start with this article written by Dr. James Alan Fox, Professor of Criminology, Law and Public Policy Northeastern University. He reminds us that even the term school shooting is an ill-defined term, its vagueness making it the perfect propaganda phrase. Frequently, media news outlets will intentionally use the phrase “school shooting” to describe events, like suicides, which are not school shootings in order to make ratings and get clicks. Another study from Northeastern University shows that school shootings are not more common now than in the past, only the perception of them has become more common. They have actually been declining since the Nineties!

So why do so many Americans think kids are in more danger than ever before? Why do we keep repeating this lie despite how much it is harming the students themselves? Because news media outlets, politicians, and social media sources trade on your fear in order to make money and gain power. In the process they create a feedback loop of fear and attention that benefits them and their political allies.

Then read this article from the ACLU about problems in American schools. While it largely deals with the issues that minorities and impoverished schools face in the United States and the effect of over-policing on schools and school students, towards the end it spends significant time talking about how violence is reported in schools. It reports that of the 230 reports of school shootings in America it found that the data was “mostly erroneous” with multiple school districts reporting that every single school in their district had school shootings occur at them when, in fact, none of them had. These accounted for 63 of the reported cases alone.

At that is just the tip of the iceberg.

In 2018, NPR did an independent study where they investigated every school shooting compiled and released by the government. I am reproducing the article in its entirety below for two reasons. First, I want to make sure you read it and people are more likely to read an article they’re already on than they are to follow a link. Second, this study shows just how much the government and media mislead, manipulate, and deceive the public through fearmongering on an unbelievable scale. By the end of it you will have the facts – that hundreds of school shootings do not happen every year in the United States; that American students are not in serious or increasing danger from gun violence, and that news media reporters will lie through their teeth and/or repeat data ignorantly and stupidly as long as it fits their narrative, confirms their biases, and gets you to support them; the truth is irrelevant to those in power, especially if it terrifies you into supporting their polices and power grabs. So I want to make sure it survives in some form just in case NPR ever decides to purge it sometime in the future.

This article picks up immediately below. The only change I made was the addition of the very last photo. Elsewise everything is as close to the original as I am capable of making it.

******

The School Shootings That Weren’t

By: ANYA KAMENETZ, ALEXIS ARNOLD and EMILY CARDINALI

How many times per year does a gun go off in an American school?

We should know. But we don’t.

This spring the U.S. Education Department reported that in the 2015-2016 school year, “nearly 240 schools … reported at least 1 incident involving a school-related shooting.” The number is far higher than most other estimates.

But NPR reached out to every one of those schools repeatedly over the course of three months and found that more than two-thirds of these reported incidents never happened. Child Trends, a nonpartisan nonprofit research organization, assisted NPR in analyzing data from the government’s Civil Rights Data Collection.

We were able to confirm just 11 reported incidents, either directly with schools or through media reports.

In 161 cases, schools or districts attested that no incident took place or couldn’t confirm one. In at least four cases, we found, something did happen, but it didn’t meet the government’s parameters for a shooting. About a quarter of schools didn’t respond to our inquiries.

“When we’re talking about such an important and rare event, [this] amount of data error could be very meaningful,” says Deborah Temkin, a researcher and program director at Child Trends.

The Education Department, asked for comment on our reporting, noted that it relies on school districts to provide accurate information in the survey responses and says it will update some of these data later this fall. But, officials added, the department has no plans to republish the existing publication.

This confusion comes at a time when the need for clear data on school violence has never been more pressing. Students around the country are heading back to school this month under a cloud of fear stemming from the most recent mass shootings in Parkland, Fla., and Santa Fe, Texas.

At least 53 new school safety laws were passed in states in 2018. Districts are spending millions of dollars to “harden” schools with new security measures and equipment. A blue-ribbon federal school safety commission led by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is holding public events around the country, including one in Alabama Tuesday. Children are spending class time on active-shooter drills and their parents are buying bulletproof backpacks.

Our reporting highlights just how difficult it can be to track school-related shootings and how researchers, educators and policymakers are hindered by a lack of data on gun violence.

“I think someone pushed the wrong button”

The Civil Rights Data Collection for 2018 required every public school — more than 96,000 — to answer questions on a wide range of issues.

It asked what sounded like a simple question:

In the 2015-2016 school year, “Has there been at least one incident at your school that involved a shooting (regardless of whether anyone was hurt)?”

The answer — “nearly 240 schools (0.2 percent of all schools)” — was published this spring.

The government’s definition included any discharge of a weapon at school-sponsored events or on school buses. Even so, that would be a rate of shootings, and a level of violence, much higher than anyone else had ever found.

For comparison, the Everytown for Gun Safety database, citing media reports, listed just 29 shootings at K-12 schools between mid-August 2015 and June 2016. There is little overlap between this list and the government’s, with only eight schools appearing on both.

A separate investigation by the ACLU of Southern California also was able to confirm fewer than a dozen of the incidents in the government’s report, while 59 percent were confirmed errors.

The Civil Rights Data Collection dates to 1968. The Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights administers the survey every two years. Every public school is required by law to complete it. These findings often drive public conversations.

For example, the CRDC was the source of recent reports that black students were suspended from school at rates much higher than whites — information that inspired changes in discipline policy across the country.

The survey has dozens of items, ranging from how many middle schoolers passed algebra I to how many students with disabilities were restrained or secluded. It can be completed by filling out an online form or uploading data.

One item, about “Firearm Use,” was required for the first time for all schools in the most recent data collection.

Most of the school leaders NPR reached had little idea of how shootings got recorded for their schools.

For example, the CRDC reports 26 shootings within the Ventura Unified School District in Southern California.

“I think someone pushed the wrong button,” said Jeff Davis, an assistant superintendent there. The outgoing superintendent, Joe Richards, “has been here for almost 30 years and he doesn’t remember any shooting,” Davis added. “We are in this weird vortex of what’s on this screen and what reality is.”

“We got wind of it and nipped it in the bud”

In other cases, something may have happened, but not the firearm discharge the survey asked about.

The biggest discrepancy in sheer numbers was the 37 incidents listed in the CRDC for the Cleveland Metropolitan School District. Roseann Canfora, the district’s chief communications officer, told us that, in fact, 37 schools reported “possession of a knife or a firearm,” which is the previous question on the form.

The number 37, then, was apparently entered on the wrong line.

Similarly, the CRDC lists four shootings among the 16 schools of the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District in California. Gail Pinsker, spokeswoman for the district, says that “going back 20-plus years,” no one can remember any incident involving a firearm. Their best guess, she says, is that there was some kind of mistake in coding, where an incident involving something like a pair of scissors (California Education Code 48915[c][2]), for example, got inflated into one involving a firearm (48915[c][1]).

Ray Poole, the chief of legal services for the Nassau County School District in Florida, told us that at one school where a shooting was reported, Callahan Middle School, on Nov. 21, 2015, a Saturday, a student took a picture of himself at home holding a gun and posted it to social media. “We got wind of it and nipped it in the bud.” No shooting.

The CRDC shows seven shootings in DeKalb County, Ga. Police reports provided to us by that district give a sense of more of the many, many ways the data collection may have gone wrong.

At Redan Middle School, there is a report of a toy cap gun fired on a school bus — not a shooting.

The CRDC shows a shooting at Stone Mountain Middle School, but a police report shows an incident at Stone Mountain High School instead.

And district officials provided a police report showing that there was a shooting after a McNair High School football game — in August 2016, after the time period covered in the survey.

Unacceptable burden

The Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights received complaints about the wording and administration of this survey even before it went out.

A June 2014 research report commissioned to improve the CRDC as a whole noted that in previous data collections, districts had experienced “unacceptable levels of reporting burden.” They complained that the CRDC asks them to report information that is similar to what states already collect, but in a different format, or at a level of specificity that they don’t currently track.

Also at issue, the internal report says, was a “lack of clarity in the definitions of key terms.” When it came to “Offenses,” the group of questions including firearm use, districts “indicated dissatisfaction with the categories provided, specifically that the CRDC categories did not align with the categories used in state reporting, other federal reporting, and/or their own district databases.”

As an example of this lack of alignment, the federal Gun-Free Schools Act requires schools in states that receive federal funds to expel students who bring a gun to school and requires districts in those states to report the circumstances of such expulsions to the state — regardless of whether a gun goes off.

The state of Florida asks schools to report “weapons possession,” excluding pocketknives. California asks schools to report suspensions and expulsions resulting from “possession, sale, furnishing of a firearm” or “imitation firearm.”

And so on.

There’s also potential for confusion within the CRDC itself. While this particular item refers clearly to “a shooting,” the previous item asks about a long list of incidents, some involving “a firearm or explosive device” and others involving “a weapon.”

Temkin at Child Trends, who has long studied bullying and school climate, says this wording “could cause confusion.”

“Best practices in data collection are not to include double-barreled items,” she says, such as asking about a “firearm or explosive device” in the same question. An explosive device could be something like a pipe bomb or even a firecracker.

NPR submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to learn more about problems with the data collection, and we received emails that schools and districts sent as they grappled with this kind of confusion. For example, the Omro school district in Wisconsin wanted to know whether a consensual paintball-gun fight involving several students should be considered an “attack with a weapon” or a “possession of a firearm.”

Another reason the shooting data may show these kinds of problems, Temkin adds, is that the item is so new. “Because this was the first year this was asked of all schools, they may not have been as prepared to respond to this item.”

And there’s another factor at work as well: the law of really, really big numbers. Temkin notes that “240 schools is less than half of 1 percent,” of the schools in the survey. “It’s in the margin of error.”

Liz Hill, an Education Department spokeswoman, told NPR that “at least five districts have submitted requests to OCR to amend the school-related shootings data that they submitted for the 2015-16 CRDC.” The plan is to issue what is called “errata” to update the data, but the original document will not be republished, Hill said.

Hill made the point that any “misreporting” is the schools’ responsibility, not the department’s: “As always, data reported by recipients is self-reported and self-certified.”

After we contacted the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified district about the four reported shootings, the district emailed the Office for Civil Rights to try to correct the information. No shootings happened, officials said.

The Office for Civil Rights responded on July 25:

“The CRDC accepts correction requests for up to one year from the moment the submission period opens. For the 2015-16 collection, the corrections period closed on June 30, 2018, and for this reason your data correction request cannot be accepted. However, a data note will be included on the data file to ensure users are aware of the errors you are reporting.”

NPR’s Clare Lombardo contributed research for this piece.